Category

Why Aren’t We Saints?

The Insights of Infatuation

By | Marriage & Family, Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | 2 Comments

Its no great revelation that “infatuation doesn’t last”. We know, and yet we all forget when the time comes, that the infatuation stage or mode in a relationship is passing and short-term and should not be the basis of one’s relationship. Even in the stage of infatuation, two lovers must be thinking longer term – asking deeper questions, seeking to learn about one another, seeking to become better lovers.

Now that I am married, while I do have days when I feel infatuated again with my wife, most days I am content with peaceful joy in my marriage rather than the flighty infatuation I once had.

Of course the biggest change that occurs when the infatuation leaves is that whereas before one’s lover seemed to be able to do no wrong and the act of charitably loving them in every situation was almost instinctual rather than willful, now one’s will must often be engaged. The choice of love now loses the feelings of infatuation that made the choice so easy.

Though infatuation itself is simply a state of one’s feelings, mostly brought on by biology, and thus shouldn’t be pursued, relied upon, or expected to last forever, I think we can learn some valuable lessons by reflecting on our hearts in the state of infatuation. Especially on days when we are struggling to love, struggling to be patient, or struggling to fulfill our responsibilities – during these times, reflecting on the state of our previously infatuate hearts can be very insightful, and not necessarily in the ways you might initially think.

Two instances of infatuation come to mind that bear reflection – infatuation as it presented itself in the early days of my relationship with my now-wed wife and infatuation as it is still stirred up sometimes in my heart today.

First, thinking back to the early days of my relationship, It is interesting to recall the state and movements of one’s infatuate heart. Again, the choice to love didn’t even feel like a choice – it was a movement, a passion, and a drive almost. In fact this often gets people into trouble because they forget that love is indeed a choice, and aren’t prepared when the feelings settle.

But it is nevertheless helpful to remember our hearts as they were in infatuation. Not just “how easy it was to love then and how much harder it sometimes is now”, but precisely how did I love? What things did I do? It seems that in the struggle with the choice to love in the present, I may be able to gain insight from the past.

This struck me most poignantly one day when I had found myself frustrated with my mother. After a trying phone call, I had felt the old teenager in me rise in my chest. For a moment I seethed and prayed for patience. But suddenly and inexplicably two thoughts shone clearly in my mind: 1) How I treated my then girlfriend (now wife) and 2) how I treated my mom.

The former I had been decidedly infatuated with, the latter, obviously not. But the comparison hit me nevertheless like a load of bricks. With no small help from infatuation, I was patient with my girlfriend, would listen to her on the phone for hours without growing weary, and would receive every possible irritant with ease. However in the case of my dear mother, I was constantly impatient, could find no time to listen to her, and would instantly become defensive and irritated at the slightest provocation.

However the epiphany did not end there. I saw not just the passive ways I loved and respected my girlfriend for whom I pined, but also the active ways. I always asked how her day was, I constantly inquired as to her feelings, likes and dislikes, and I bought her gifts and left notes as gestures of affection.

But how did I actively love my mother? Certainly one’s infatuated love for one’s girlfriend and the familial love for one’s mother are going to look very different, but nevertheless the comparison shone true. I never asked in any sincerely curious or caring way how my mother was doing. I rarely went out of my way to show her any affection or respect. I realized I knew (or remember) almost nothing about my mothers’ likes, dislikes, past life, or feelings.

As said, the realizations hit home and took root. I began to put these things into practice and love my mother better.

The second instance of infatuation that bears reflection are those days and times when infatuation returns.

All day today I had made small choices – an act of laziness here, letting myself be distracted there, and being selfish in little ways, right and left. Unsurprisingly, later on today when I found myself in a situation that called for patience and charity, my heart was hard and peevish.

As my wife went out to do errands I rallied slightly, saying some prayers, making a to-do list, and shaking myself out of laziness. By the time she returned I had completed my to do list, sought God in prayer and some needed silence, and was feeling in a much better mood all around.

Furthermore, as she walked in with the groceries, I felt a bit of the old fire rekindle in my heart. Conversation came quickly, I found myself feeling concerned and interested, and I was up on nimble toes setting the table for the dinner which I had prepared while she was out.

The summary and conclusion of these two reflections, for me, constitute a personal lesson in the nature of love, emotions, and the relationship between the two.

In the first reflection, recalling the instances where infatuation had made the choice to love my girlfriend practically a non-choice, showed me where I was falling short in loving my mother as I was called to do. However even more practically, the reflection had given me specific suggestions as to how I was to love her.

Sometimes this can be the struggle. Its not just that we are having a hard time choosing to love, but rather in the hardness of our hearts we almost temporarily seem to forget how to love, and all we can think of is how annoyed we are or how tough the situation is (feels). When in this situation, it can be helpful thus to return in reflection to a time and a relationship where infatuation/feelings had made the choices to love quite easy, and then to procure from this reflection specific acts of love and mercy that we can perform in the present.

This first reflection is practical enough and mostly common sensical, but the second reflection shines additional light. In the second reflection we see two instances where actions produce or prompt feelings. Lazy/selfish actions produce an apathetic and selfish heart. Loving/obedient/humble actions produce a heart of charity. It wasn’t until I consciously, willfully performed acts of charity that I began to really feel appreciative of my mom again.

The key here is that while we often look to feelings, emotions, and indeed “infatuation” to be the motor for our actions, while these are sometimes given to us as a grace, WEcan control and are responsible for our actions, regardless of our feelings. Whereas we often wait for and are dismayed when we don’t have “good mood” to be able to “act like a Christian”, we always have the choice to love, even in the worst of moods.

In summary, I have a very obsessive, anxious, inward personality and when I hit a situation in which I am finding it difficult to love, often the “head-game” is what really gets me.

Thus, I offer to you the same advice I give myself: When a time of desolation is making it difficult to love, reflect on the times of consolation. Reflecting on my past infatuation with my girlfriend I can glean specific acts of love that I should put into practice even today, when my feelings aren’t providing much help. Furthermore, reflecting on current instances of infatuation, I recall the oft forgotten common sense that I am always in control and responsible for my actions and that where my will leads, my heart will follow.

Recall the actions of love and reclaim the primacy of your will to accomplish them. Then, take heart and trust that if you choose to love in action you will in turn kindle (or rekindle) the passion.

The proof of love is in the works. Where love exists, it works great things. But when it ceases to act, it ceases to exist. — Pope St. Gregory the Great

We can do no great things; only small things with great love. — Blessed Teresa of Calcutta’

Marriage is an act of will that signifies and involves a mutual gift, which unites the spouses and binds them to their eventual souls, with whom they make up a sole family – a domestic church. – Pope John Paul II

Two Fears – The Reasons We Avoid Discovering Whether God Is Really There

By | Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | 5 Comments

First let me say that I am one who thinks it is healthy and helpful for people to question their faith at some point. Everyone has doubts and questions about their faith, but most people tend to bury or ignore them rather than to ever bring them out into the light.

I think a large portion of the apathy of modern believers is attributable to the fact that they are unwilling to ask the tough questions they have about the faith. Because of fear, they refuse to ask whether God really exists, whether Jesus was a real person, whether the Catholic Church is true and is guided into all truth.

But I ask, how can one really put faith in a God one has never had the courage to seek out? In fact perhaps the first act of faith – faith at least in truth – would be to face our fears  and seek God Himself.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines faith as “Man’s response to God”. Man responds to a God He has met, a God who has ever been waiting for Man to finally let go of His own assumptions, his own fluffy hopes, his own rendition of “I did it My Way” – to finally open up to the real God and accept no substitutes

One way or another, we have to continually break past our ideas toward the real God, and this repetition of the formation of our concept of God and the proceeding iconoclasm is a lifelong process. Why is it necessary? Because God desires nothing less than a real relationship with us.

God doesn’t want to be our Santa Claus. He doesn’t want to be up on the shelf when we need Him, and He doesn’t just want to be an idea or vague impression that we comfort ourselves with. He also doesn’t just want to be our best bet – the conclusion we cling to because more of the evidence points in His direction.

If this was the kind of relationship God wanted, if he intended us to stop at any of these points, then what are we to do with the incarnation? The “word became flesh”! The creator entered His creation, the author entered His own story, to touch us, to speak to us, to teach us to love by example.

We tend to think that a relationship in which God is present, interacting with us, speaking to us, guiding our lives, and touching our hearts is only the lot of the very great saints. But we must face the facts here: 1) We are all called to be saints and 2) Not one of us has a valid excuse as to why we aren’t.

Every one of us has been given (and squandered) enough grace to be saints – 2 Corinthians 12:19 says “my grace is sufficient”. The only thing that has stopped this has been ourselves. Plain and simple!

But He still wants us! He still waits for the day that we grow discontent with a shallow relationship with Him, discontent with only hoping He’s there, finally ready to shed the imitations and idols in exchange for the “Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the TRUTH”. We really can have it, but we have to want it and seek it.

One of the reasons people aren’t able to really pursue God as a person, as I said before, is that we are really unwilling to ask tough questions.

These are actually very basic questions about who God is, whether He is really there, whether He really loves us – pretty fundamental questions if one is to enter into relationship! Nevertheless, though we have these questions but seldom drum up the courage to ask them.

There are TWO main fears that keep people from truly seeking God. Two main fears that the devil plays upon to trap us into wishy-washy faith:

Fear that God may not be real.
Fear that God might indeed be real after all.

Let me explain.

One of the first and most obvious reasons people do not ask the questions and pursue a relationship with God is that they fear He may not be real. The fear that is the source of this doubt is the fear that keeps people from ever pursuing the answers. There is a certain solace found in uncertainty.

Most people would rather hold on to a God they are “pretty sure” is real, rather than to attempt to seek out a real one. The problem with seeking a “real” God” is that there can be only two outcomes to the search: either He is real or He isn’t! This is dangerous! Usually too dangerous for comfort.

A God about which one is “pretty sure” can never be proven false. No amount of evidence can ever take Him away and some people prefer this solace to truth. But on the other side of the coin, one cannot have a true relationship with Him either.

It is much more comfortable to have a faith that never actually has to face the question “God, are you there?” It is not that we don’t want this type of faith. We wish we could meet Him, have confidence in His presence, come into relationship with Him, and put a confident, divinely gifted faith in this relationship of love. This is a kind of faith we all desire to have, but are afraid to ask for or to seek.

We think that to so desire such a faith may be presumptuously arrogant, unattainably obscure, or ultimately undesirable in that if we actually grasped at a faith which involves the encounter with the present and true God, we might instead find him absent and false.

The second reason that people fear to seek the real God is that they are afraid He might really be there after all.

To quote CS Lewis: “An ‘impersonal God;– well and good. A subjective God of beauty, truth and goodness, inside our own heads — better still. A formless life-force surging through us, a vast power which we can tap — best of all. But God Himself, alive, pulling at the other end of the cord, perhaps, approaching an infinite speed, the hunter, king, husband — that is quite another matter. There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall? There comes a moment when people who have been dabbling in religion (“Man’s search for God!”) suddenly draw back. Supposing we really found Him? We never meant it to come to that! Worse still, supposing He had found us?”

In other words, people are afraid of a God who actually makes a difference. A God about which we are only “pretty sure is out there… somewhere… maybe…” cannot ask much of us. Our lives needn’t change for such a God and we can safely contain Him as a bullet point on our list of priorities.

But what of a God who is alive? A master? A King? This is often more than we have bargained for, and perhaps we prefer to leave well enough alone. This is why people can have such a visceral aversion to the suggestion of miracles, apparitions, prayers being answered, and the like, even by “good Christians”. It is not as much our intellects being sensible as much as it is our hearts fearing a real God who is alive and can be ignored no longer.

In conclusion, I ask you to consider these two fears that may be keeping you or someone you know from truly seeking God.

Fear that He may not be real.
Fear that He may indeed by real.

But we must seek truth, brothers and sisters, and accept nothing less. God is indeed alive and waits for us. He awaits the day that we want Him enough to not be content with anything less than He Himself.

If you ask the questions, seek the truth, accept no substitutes, you will find God.

God the creator, God the author, God the conqueror, God the King. If you so desire it, you will find Him. Nay, He will find you.

One’s Attitude Towards Truth

By | Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | No Comments

I think it is important to evaluate our attitude toward truth and our beliefs. It is important to how we interact with other, especially those of differing beliefs, but also, perhaps more important to the integrity of our own character – for if our character becomes corrupted, our interactions with other will not show much fruit.

A few lines of scripture got me thinking today. Check these out:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mass reading a while back was from the first book of Corinthians.

1 Cor 8:1b-7, 11-13

Brothers and sisters:
Knowledge inflates with pride, but love builds up.
If anyone supposes he knows something,
he does not yet know as he ought to know.
But if one loves God, one is known by him.

~~~~~~~~~~~~

As Catholics, we believe that the teachings of the Church and the scriptures and traditions passed to us through the Church are indeed true. Also, we believe God is real because we believe we have met Him. He has come to us in prayer, in the Eucharist, and shown his grace and guidance throughout our lives. We have met truth and put our faith in Him.

What then should our attitude toward the truth be?

I think this is an important question because, quite frankly, we are not very good at sharing the truth, and I believe our attitudes toward it can sometimes be the culprit. Unfortunately these examples of bad attitudes toward truth are the only ones our culture really picks up on and pays attention to – the religious people who are rude, overbearing, intolerant (in a proper sense of tolerance), and thoroughly uncharitable though they claim to have met truth and charity Himself.

As I myself have grappled with this issue and with my own attitudes for truth, especially during my time on a secular college campus, I did a lot of reexamining of how I regard truth.

Something I realized was this: I always thought of myself as one who had found truth. I thought I had figured it out, I thought I had found God and come into relationship with him, and I thought I had made sense out of Catholic doctrine to the satisfaction of my intellect. Furthermore, when talking to people of other faiths and beliefs, I regarded myself as possessing the truth which the rest of the world needed.

Its not that the Truths that we believe aren’t “true” – that’s not what I’m getting at at all. Rather, I think we need to take a look at our attitudes toward Truth.

Did I find the truth, or did the Truth find me?
Some things may make sense to me, but do I really have it all figured out?
Is truth really something I “have” or “posess”?
Is it something I have found or subdued, or is it something so much greater and mightier than I could conceive of, something which, far from having subdued, have barely peeked out at from the bushes?

Here’s the thing: Even when God has called us into His church, into His very Body, and fed us with His own flesh, so that we are indeed in communion with Truth Himself, surely the only proper attitude is awe and wonder and adoration of Truth, right?

If my attitude is snobbery, arrogance, or of one who thinks he has conquered or subdued truth, then people are quite right to question whether I have met Truth at all.

The first thing we have to be sure, thus, is that we really have met truth. Go seek Christ. this takes silence and patience. Also, learn your faith – there is much more there than you ever imagined – beauties and treasures we often ignore.

Then, when we encounter others we must keep in mind that WE HAVE NOT FOUND TRUTH – He has found us. We aren’t wise gurus who the rest of the world needs to listen to, we are the little children playing at Jesus’ feet who run off to tell our friends and everyone of the incredible teacher in our midst.

We can’t “give” Truth/the faith/Christ to people as if it/He was some token that we posses.

We didn’t figure the faith out, we didn’t find God, we certainly didn’t discover Truth. Our attitude must always be one of submission to truth, one of awareness that we are infinitely smaller than our creator and infinitely undeserving of His seeking us out and saving us.

What is really going on, and thus what our attitude should reflect, is that we have met Him, and we want others to meet Him too. Not only is this attitude the correct one, it is the only attitude with which God can work through us to reach out to others.

I think i’ll continue this reflection in a “Part 2” as there is more to be said about evangelization and ecumenical dialogue itself. With our attitude towards truth in mind, how might we re-evaluate how we talk to other people? How might it change the way we talk especially to non-believers?

Just some things to think about.

Your fellow Truth-seeker,

JM

Spiritual Maturity Towards Truth – Can you handle it? John 6

By | Why Aren't We Saints? | No Comments

Recently I heard a priest preaching on the gospel of John chapter 6, and he pointed out that by the end of the chapter Jesus’ followers had continued leaving him until finally only the faithful few were left.

What Jesus’ followers faced in this chapter was a real test of their spiritual maturity towards truth. One gets the sense that many of the followers, up to this point, had been challenged, but never to the breaking point. The truths that they heard always made sense to them, “felt” right to them, were easy to follow in one sense or another. But in this chapter, particularly with Christ’s declarations about His body and blood, their maturity toward truth was tested and a great many failed the test.

What do I mean by “maturity toward truth”?  Simply this: One aspect of spiritual maturity consists in an attitude of conformity to truth. One seeks truth, expects truth to be bigger/better/more mysterious/more perfect/than oneself, and one attempts to conform to truth whenever one finds it.

We are all a bit immature when it comes to truth, especially in earlier stages of our spiritual journey. We like the teachings of Christ that “feel good” and pass over the ones that are hard. We readily tackle “big” sins and obvious flaws in our character, but ignore subtler imperfections that we don’t think we could ever bring ourselves to address.

One instance I have seen a lot of is the application of faith to my life rather than the application of my life to faith. Its easy to always receive and interpret the faith through the lens of “my life” – which problems I have, which experiences have I had, what needs I feel that I have, which prayers and devotions “work for me”. This is all well and good to a point, but it begs the question, when will I begin applying myself to the faith, rather than the faith to myself?

When do I start dealing with the sins and imperfections that God wants me to instead of the ones I want to focus on? Sometimes its easy to feel quite accomplished when the “big sins” have been worked out, and we rock back on our heels when we do so. However, there are many character flaws that we never even consider addressing – usually they are ones that are close to us, usually ones that involve a shot to our pride to deal with.

When do I start doing the “good” that I am called to, rather than the good I want to do? Similar to the last one, its so easy to focus on doing “goods” that aren’t really ares to do, while ignoring ones that are. For example, for some it is easy to desire to be a missionary to a foreign country, be a saint in the workplace, a model while at parish events, but to continuously ignore more primary responsibilities – relationships with family, being a holy person rather than just “looking holy”, evangelizing family/friends rather than those I am less close to. Everyone’s situation is different and so these may or may not apply to you – Nevertheless, the point is that we easily gravitate toward doing goods what we “want” to do over  what we are “called” to do.

When do I start learning what the Church actually teaches vs my opinions? Its easy to always be content with our knowledge of Church teaching and doctrine, even though we know it is incomplete and quite lacking. We like to “stick to our guns”, to assert our knowledge, to relish in the teachings we know and are excited about. We don’t like learning new teachings, ones we aren’t as comfortable with, ones that perhaps challenge us in ways we don’t want to be challenged.

Bottom line is this: We are called to be perfect as our heavenly father is. Thus we must realize that the state of being we are called to is necessarily “other”. We aren’t called to remain as we are, we really are called to change, to be transformed.

We must realize that if we are only changing in ways we are comfortable with, only learning things we like in ways that we like,  only dealing with sins we think are important, only doing goods that we want to do, only applying truth to our lives, then we aren’t ultimately being transformed. We may be doing a little “tidying up”, but we aren’t being transformed into anything but our own idealized version of ourselves – which, since it is our ideal, is still “us” and not “Him”.

It seems to me that a real point of spiritual maturity, thus, is the point at which we begin to realize this and actively start to apply ourselves to truth, rather than the other way round.

We begin to do a lot more asking and listening in prayer than telling. We begin to address sins we’ve been ignoring for years and begin to take up primary responsibilites/duties that we have been making secondary. We begin to read, listen to, and even pursue the “hard teachings” that we had hitherto avoided. We stop being bored (isn’t boredom just a symptom of the lack of self-application?)

At some point we begin to embrace not only hard teachings but even hardships and trials, because we know that we are sinners in need of saving.At some point, by God’s grace, we will be mature enough to give Peter’s answer to Christ’s challenge at the end of John Chapter 6: ” Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. We believe and know you are the holy one of God” (verses 68-69).

Daily Mass – Living the Dream!

By | Prayer, Why Aren't We Saints? | No Comments

My wife and I have been attending daily mass ever since we moved to Zanesville Ohio (a few months ago). Before we were married, we lived close to each other at the Newman center at Bowling Green State University and attended mass frequently also.

Since we arrived here, we made daily mass a priority with the idea in mind that this daily sacrifice and prayer would be a healthy routine to establish. This was made easier in that we found a pleasant daily-mass-going community, greater liturgy and homilies by the Dominican friars (St. Thomas Aquinas Parish), and the church is not far away and easy to get to over lunch hour.

While I generally enjoy daily mass, I have tended to regard it as just another spiritual practice. Not that I didn’t appreciate the eucharist, the source and summit of the faith (and all that) but going every day never seemed that special.

In prayer at mass today, I decided that I will now make daily mass one of my highest priorities.

Here’s the thing: Why do I work? Why do I save my money? What are we working towards?

Well, at least in theory, personal holiness is my first priority as well as the spiritual health of my family. Thus my working/saving/supporting must be to try to provide the kind of life that will help my family to become holy.

It occurred to me today that daily mass is the kind of thing one pencils into one’s hypothetical perfect schedule. You know, the “If I had a million dollars I would…” kind of hypothetical. When a devout catholic does this, “being able to go to daily mass” is usually on the list. It’s just obvious!

And yet, I’m always tempted to think of mass as “just another nice spiritual practice”, rather than the source and summit of my relationship with God in His Church. I would list mass as part of the perfect schedule, and yet how often do I find myself getting weary of it?

I guess what really hit me today was that if I am given a good job, money enough for the gas, and a great Catholic church nearby and I am NOT seeing daily mass as a no-brainer, then I need to think about what the goals and priorities in my life really are.

There are many things we have to save our money for – house, cars, our children’s education, etc. But we have already been given the means to take our family to mass every day, and if holiness is indeed our first priority, how could we not take the opportunity?

My wife and I are saving our money, working hard, preparing to give our family the best life possible, but part of that “best life” is already ours for free – a daily celebration of God’s love. A daily communion with the God of the universe and His body the Church. Daily readings from His holy words. A daily sacrament of cosmic life-changing power.

With this in mind, its not that we are required to go to mass everyday, but why wouldn’t we?

It is a great undeserved privelege which we will be appreciating more in the future.We really are living the dream!

Your brother in Truth,

JM

Feelings vs Action #1

By | Why Aren't We Saints? | No Comments

The relationship between feeling and action is interesting in how consistently it is confused today. And not simply confused, but completely flip flopped at almost every turn.

Feelings are seen as the cause of action. When I feel “good”, I am able to be kind. When I am in a “bad mood”, then rudeness and unkindness cannot be helped.

While this is certainly consistant with modern worldviews in which human beings really are just complex machines with the mere illusion of free will, it is a grave error in understanding feelings and action.

Take love, in the modern mind, as an example of the collosal but consistant misplacement of the involvement of feelings and action.

Love is consistantly seen as a feeling that leads to good actions. When two people “fall in love” they do loving things like buy gifts, make sacrifices, and get married. However, they really can’t be expected to keep “doing” these things when the fall out of love, can they?

Like the old song “I’ve lost that loving feeling”, the “feeling” of love is sought for with good intentions. The good feeling is sought so that through the feeling, the good actions might be made possible. When the good feelings are absent, we mourn our inability to do good, and continue to seek the return of good feelings.

In my own relationships, my own marriage, how often do I find myself thinking “ I wish I could get out of this bad mood so that I could just be kind/work hard/speak up/ etc,” you can fill in the blank.

And so with this relationship between feelings and actions in mind, we often feel trapped. We certainly want to do good, to excell, to work hard, to grow, to be kind, to make sacrifices, but we lack the feeling. Without feeling hard-working, how can we expect to work hard? Without feeling sacrificial, how am I to make sacrifices? Without feeling kind, warm, and loving, how am I to act kind, warm, and loving? And so we seek the feeling in hopes that we may unlock the ability to act.

However, to again take love as the example, where do feeling and action really fit in to love? At its core, love is primarily the action. Regardless of how readily it is identified and associated with loving feelings, at its core, love is the action. Love is the action of willing the good of the other. Through one’s own will, the good of the other is strove for.

Oftentimes, willing is indeed accompanied by good feelings, but at its core is the action. The act of love is also much more important for our consideration because it is the part we can control. We can’t cause ourselves to “feel” a certain way. Feelings and emotions are not a muscle that we can flex. Our will, however, is.

We can take this further though. It is not simply the case that feelings have been focused on and actions ignored. As I said before, the two have been flip-flopped and their relationship reversed.

We see feelings and emotions as the cause or catalyst of our actions. Not only is this not true ( we are the cause of our actions) but it is actually the opposite.

What we discover is that when we actively begin to love, the feelings of love are cultivated. Conversely, often when we are feeling selfish or unkind, it is because at some level of our being we are acting selfish or unkind.

Our hearts are like horses (bear with me). Plato once used the metaphor of a chariot to illustrate the soul, and in the metaphor the feeling/emotive/passionate parts of the soul were represented by the horses, while the will was represented by the charioteer.

Horses and hearts are both fickle – the look around, they wander, they stop to eat the dandelions. Sometimes they are looking in the same direction you are, and then it seems that getting there is very easy. But it becomes very hard when I want to get from point A to point B, when there is so much delicious grass at point A.

I do not want to belabor the horse metaphor, but I may be forced to because of how well it works out.

The horse, like the heart, needs to be trained. When the horse is distracted and untrained, its very hard for the rider to get anywhere quickly. However, when the horse is trained and the two begin to work together in unison, what is the result? There is something truly glorious, even epic and poetic about the harmony between a rider and his horse – they work together, the ride in unison, the ride as one unit, the fly with the wind.

When the heart is distracted and untrained, the will has to push hard to perform acts of love and sacrifice. However, when the will pushes through anyway, what happens? The heart begins to follow. Real passion only comes through work. It comes out in the things we have strove for, fought for, disciplined ourselves for, sacrificed for.

All this has been a little rambling, I know. But seriously though, how often do we find ourselves trapped in the modern reversal of feeling and action? How often do we feel trapped by our emotions? Our emotions of sadness, depression, grumpiness, anxiety, and the list goes on. These have become greater and greater problems for citizens of the modern world because they are told, however subtly, that emotion precedes action. One can’t love, if one doesn’t feel “in love”. With this in mind, bad emotions become an imaginary cage that people are convinced is inescapable.

But if one always waits to “feel right” before “acting right”, it will be as a rider who lets the horse lead him. Sure, he may go the right way some of the time – but much of the time he won’t get anywhere at all.

For a few weeks my daily personal challenge has been to reflect on “action” every time I am “feeling bad”. What I have discovered is that whenever I am feeling grumpy, it is usually because I have been acting lazy, selfish, and inward. The days it is hardest to focus on work, are the days where in my mind I have been procrastinating, stalling, or otherwise slacking off.

And of course, there are certainly times when bad emotions seem to pop out of nowhere, if I muster the will to act rightly in spite of these emotions, do you know what happens? Horse and rider become one, once again.

Ok, now I’m really done. Thanks for reading,

In Christ,

JM