All Posts By

JonMarc Grodi

“The Best Things in Life” by Peter Kreeft

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

Here is a little gem of a book that I happened to discover in the library of the Catholic apostolate I work at.  It’s called “The Best Things in Life” and it is another of Kreeft’s characterizations of Socrates trying to make head or tails of our modern day.

In the form the original dialogues, the book is comprised of conversation between Socrates and students at “Desperate State” university – how many of us could have applied that title to our own forum of learning?

It takes a chapter or two to get in the rhythm of reading the fast paced dialogue, however one is rewarded by an engaging, witty, socratic challenge to the ideologies and sensibilities of the day. Never telling or preaching, always merely asking and pointing out, Kreeft portrays a convincing and delightful and captivating Socrates – if only he could “corrupt” the minds of today’s youth like he was accused of in Greece?

I would recommend this book both as a quick and delightful refreshment to seasoned thinkers as well as a powerful but engaging challenge to any muddled modernist mind.

Announcing a third…

By | Journal, Marriage & Family | No Comments

This last tuesday my wife and I concluded – based on a second positive pregnancy test – that we were “with child”.

Thank you Jesus!

We made the announcement to friends and family on december 8th, the feast of the immaculate conception. Teresa quipped that we’d still need to get the baby baptized. (get it?)

We think that she ought to be due sometime in August. Please keep us in your prayers as we prepare for parenthood!

Happy Advent!

Responding to Vice with Virtue

By | Why Aren't We Saints? | 4 Comments

It seems to me to be a matter of common sense that vices are best treated by their corresponding virtues.

For instance, the prideful man must pray for and practice humility, the selfish and greedy man must look for opportunities to be generous and thus grow in charity, and so on and so forth.

This is common sense when dealing with our own spiritual lives, however I think the maxim is similarly useful when encountering vices in others.

It is easy for the vices (or perceived vices) in others to not only provoke the same vice in us, but for us to somehow feel justified in reacting thus.

For instance, when faced with someone who seems to be in the throes of pride – as evidenced by grasping for attention, easily taking offense, seeking constant affirmation, acting self-concerned, etc – how quickly we respond in a prideful iteration of our own, and think it somehow neutral or even virtuous!

I often find myself for instance actively ignoring or shushing a young, loud relative I perceive as prideful. In my heart, I somehow feel like i’m teaching them a lesson or doing right by “not encouraging them”.

But what’s really going on here? Why are they seeking attention so? Why are they being loud? Why do they seem self-concerned? Certainly there may be an element of pride there, though that is between them and God. But could it also be that they are insecure? That they are hurt or lonely? How quickly my judgement of them causes me to respond with the same vice I presume to perceive.

I often wonder how many other people whose brokeness and insecurities cause them to act out, have only been pushed further into themselves because I myself have ignored them or responded with rudeness.

The younger relative I previously mentioned has many behavioral problems. Oftentimes he will be very short with people or even begin to throw a tantrum when he is riled up.

In the recent years, my interactions with him have become an insightful and humbling source of self-reflection for me.

I noticed that while his behavioral issues and his tantrums and his attention seeking was a great source of annoyance to me, I always responded with my own vices, and at the same time felt justified in my mind.

I would be “short” with him, because I felt he needed to be quieted. I would talk harshly because I thought he needed to be taught a lesson. I ignored him because I didn’t want to reward bad behavior. All these rationalizations contented me for years, but I have begun to realize more and more how I was simply justifying responding to vice (or percieved vice) with my own.

This of course brings me back to my original suggestion: We must not only to respond to our own vices by pursuing their corresponding virtues, but we must always seek to respond to any vice (or perceived vices) in others with the corollary virtue also.

What would happen if we responded to the seemingly prideful and self-absorbed person with humility? Listening to them, letting them be first, etc. What would happen if we responded to the selfish and greedy person with charity? Being generous to them, giving even though we are liable to be taken advantage of?

Certainly such acts would seem to follow the biblical call to “love your enemies and be good to those who persecute you”. In doing so, not only do we grow in love but we can offer up our sufferings for the good of such people and our own souls.

However, I think there is also some very smart but simple psychology going on here also.

We are always responsible for our own vice – I bring up psychology not to suggest sin is simply a “social issue” or something like that. However, we can see by a mere moment of self-reflection that a lot of these vices are often rooted in deeper fears and brokenesses

In our own lives such a realization should be no cause for us to justify our sin – we are still responsible. However we should use such a realization to bring us to empathy and mercy whenever we begin to feel judgmental of others.

Often, when we act out of pride or vanity, some of the driving forces of these are our insecurities, loneliness, depression, lack of (healthy) confidence, etc. Also, many who are prone to selfishness and greed have a deep seated fear of want, fear of dependence, fear of being taken advantage of, etc.

Again, these can be no excuse for our own personal vices, however they should come into play when we deal with others.

When we encounter vices in others or what we perceive to be vices when we are annoyed or offended and are tempted to respond by our own acts of pride, selfishness, gossip, ill-will, etc, I believe we ought to attempt to recognize what virtue is needed in the situation and attempt to fill that need.

Consider the great and wise prayer attributed Saint Francis of Assisi:

“Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love;
where there is injury,pardon;
where there is doubt, faith;
where there is despair, hope;
where there is darkness, light;
and where there is sadness, joy.

O Divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
to be consoled as to console;
to be understood as to understand;
to be loved as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive;
it is in pardoning that we are pardoned;
and it is in dying that we are born to eternal life. Amen”

What it comes down to is this: whether there is a lack of God’s grace in another person or whether the lack is within us, our proper response should be to try to fill it with his love.

If there is a vice in another person, we should respond to it with virtue. Furthermore, if there is a loneliness, brokeness, or fear that is causing a person to act out, we must respond as an “instrument of peace” rather than responding with our own vices.

It should not only be our duty but our immense joy as Christians to love even the hateful person, to forgive the unforgiving person, to trust the mistrustful, to humble ourselves toward the prideful, and to give generously even to the greedy.

Our human instinct is to worry about being taken advantage of in these situations. To worry that all of our good work will simply be sucked into the black hole of anothers’ vices. However what a great honor and power to share in the sufferings of our Lord! Surely to be virtue in the face of vice embodies the very dying and rising we are called to.

As a final thought, consider the effects of responding to vices with virtue. Since the fall, sin and its effects have continued from one human to another like dominoes. We receive original sin, we experience personal sin, we experience the effects of sin, and we then respond with our own sins. As a result of this cycle, sin and its effects continue to compound and rebound and resound throughout the ages.

A grave but glorious question every human should consider is this: What will my effect be? As a member of the human race, I receive not only the tendency to sin myself but I experience the effects of the sins of others. Though this cannot be avoided, I and I alone can decide what happens to the sins that touch me.

Either these sins will be passed on, repeated, or even multiplied through my actions or… the sin will end in me.

I find this an astounding proposition: I cannot avoid the death, pain suffering, violence, fear, etc of this world, but I CAN be sure that they end with me.

I can emulate my lord in gladly accepting the pain, suffering, violence, fear, and other effects of sin that come to me, and letting them die in me. Christ took our sin and allowed it to be nailed to the cross with Him – in fact, to die with Him.

What if we were to emulate this! What if the annoyance, drama, gossip, selfishness, violence, greed, pride, lust and other vices that we encountered in the world were met with virtue in us? What if we were to take a stand and not allow these vices and their effects to live when we encountered them? What if we gladly soaked them up, gladly accepted the pain and suffering and turned it into only greater virtue, through God’s grace?

It is our choice. Either we are willing proponents of the infectious plague of sin and its effects, or we are those receive it, accept it, and let it die with us.

Thus, whenever we encounter sin or its effects – whether a vice in ourselves, a vice in others, or even simply the echoing effects of sin in the loneliness, insecurity, fear, brokeness, and others defects that cause so much acting out and unrest between humans – we should constantly exhort ourselves to joyfully embrace the situation and pursue the necessary virtues in it.

Because of Christ’s victory on the cross, the pursuit of virtue allows us not only to be healed of vice in ourselves but to heal and comfort others who suffer the same disease.

THIS is the greatness we are called to. THIS is the mission to which He has destined us. To be a channel of His peace wherever there is not peace, and to be His candle wherever there is darkness.

Every life is march from innocence, through temptation, to virtue or vice.
Lyman Abbott

The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult and left untried.
Gilbert K. Chesterton

If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end; if you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin, and in the end, despair.
C. S. Lewis

10/13/10 – Daily Dose of Catholicism and Culture

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

I work at the Coming Home Network International as a webmaster. The CHNI is a fellowship of Catholic clergy converts and those non-catholic clergy and laity who are interested in making the journey home.

The office has been abuzz as we prepare for our annual “Deep In History” conference in Columbus Ohio. For information visit http://www.chnetwork.org/DIH/deepinhistory.html

My wife and I are visiting Dayton Ohio this thursday. I am giving a talk on “Faith and Reason” to the Theology On Tap, as per the invitation of my good friend DJ Swearingen.

I will be writing (and maybe sharing video!) about faith more in the future, but for now I ask you, what is faith? I, like you, have heard my fair share of definitions, but I, perhaps also like you, have not been satisfied with either the vague and convoluted (and under-explained) definitions I have heard.

The word “faith” is bandied about so much, but what does faith really mean?

>Does it mean, as our atheist friends assume, that we simply perform the mental act of “belief” without any reason, proof, adequate knowledge, or the like?

> Does it mean, as my freshman philosophy classmates concluded, that faith is adhering to the conclusion that seems to have the most evidence? Or to the one that has the highest potential beneficial yield? (the effect of reading Pascal’s wager out of the context of the rest of Pensees)

Are these all that faith is? Or is there something more?

The “Catechism of the Catholic Church” defines faith as “ Man’s response to God”.

While simple, I think this definition is both profound and powerful.

It seems to imply that God takes the first step. It seems to imply that man cannot put faith in God except in response to Him. It seems to imply that one puts faith in God in the context of one’s relationship with God.

You see, if you take a bird’s-eye view at Catholicism, the type of relationship with God it seems to be built to encourage is one of profound closeness and unity. The seven sacraments are visible signs of the spiritual reality of God’s work – they make present to us the ministry of Jesus Christ. We eat His body, we hear Him forgive our sins in confession, we hear God’s word proclaimed at every mass. We are called by the saints into profound contemplation and have examples of the great holy men and women who entered fully into union with God.

Deep down inside I think we all want this type of close relationship with God. However, we don’t pursue it and often avoid even admitting to ourselves we want this relationship because it involves, as I mentioned in my previous post, facing our fears about God (see “Two fears”)

As I said, more to come. This is a pretty big topic for me right now and has been for a while – I appreciate your thoughts and input, especially when I begin posting my more formal reflections.

Thanks for reading!

Great Quote:

“Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried. “ (Gilbert K. Chesterton)

Great Links:

The Bishop and the Conference – Bishop Robert F. Vasa, D.D. A pretty powerful article. One bishop talks candidly and profoundly on the Bishops Conferences and the individual shepherds

Report from the Catholic Undead – Wolfgang Grassl Great article about the state of the Catholic faith in Europe and a comparison/contrast to that of America.

In Persona ET – The Curt Jester Fun article about the possibility of intelligent life on other planets. References to Lewis’ Space Trilogy which I LOVE. Some good fun and intelligent musings from the Curt Jester.

Great Book:

The Screwtape Letters – C.S. Lewis: Only Lewis can pull of books like this. What is your first visceral reaction to the thought of a book that is nothing but the correspondence from an upper level demon to a lower level demon in the field instructing him on the proper temptation of his human charge? As strange as this may sound at first, the book is not only delightful, written with Lewis’ usual charm and wit, but it can be life changing in that it is an exceedingly insightful examination of the inner spiritual battle every human being faces.

10/7/10 Daily Dose of Catholicism & Culture

By | Philosophy and Culture | No Comments

Good evening friends. Beginning this week I will be attempting to add a daily post to this blog that contains a bit of reflection for the day and a compilation of good links, quotes, book/movie/music reviews, and other odds and ends. This daily dose, in the spirit of the blog itself, will follow my walk of faith in a culture of death and will record for posterity the oases I come across in the desert – those little intersections between my catholicism and culture that raise my eyes to heaven, move my heart, get me thinking, or otherwise appear to have value in sharing with you.Read, think, discuss, enjoy!

Notes from the day: Today was my wife’s 26th birthday. After my brief reprieve since my own birthday in August, my wife is now 3 years older than I am once again. : )

Yesterday, we decided to get rid of Netflix. Now don’t get me wrong, we LOVED having Netflix and it definitely provides the most bang for the buck as a source of entertainment. However in the case of Netflix, though we had a steady supply of DVD’s in the mail and on online library streamable any time of the day or night, the problem with such easy entertainment is that it is indeed so easy.

Humans always tend toward the path of least resistance! Both the benefit and problem with movies and video games is that they require minimal effort and provide maximum “entertainment”. When push comes to shove, movies/video games eventually begin to win out over other forms of entertainment, unless conscious action is applied.

Problem for me is that at the end of the day when my wife and I are tired and ready to relax, with an almost unlimited supply of “easy” entertainment, we end up watching the tube far too much.

Now on the flip side of the coin my wife and I really do enjoy watching movies and tv together – we laugh together, discuss the plots and characters, cuddle, etc, and in these respects movies are great!

Our solution? not to eliminate TV/Movies altogether, we are just switching to a different subscription (one from blockbuster) that revolved only around getting movies in the mail. This way, we have movies/tv available to us but at the same time there is a definite cap to how much we can watch.

This is the passive side of the plan. On the active side, we are making sure to pursue other, less “easy” forms of entertainment. I think this is very important. Our appreciation – our ability to appreciate – is like a muscle and needs to be worked. Have you ever noticed that you begin to appreciate things you put time and effort into? Projects, new forms of entertainment, new food or drink, and even people!

There are many forms of entertainment that are “easy” to appreciate because they basically spoonfeed us – movies, video games, net browsing etc. This does not mean they are bad just as candy isn’t “bad”. However, if we eat too much candy (the potential for cavities and weight gain aside) our appreciation for more complex/healthy/beneficial foods will atrophy. In the same way, if we constantly rely on “easy” entertainment not only will our appreciation of greater things become weak, but we also will never grow.

Thus, its good to keep pushing ourselves. We still enjoy watching a good movie here and there but we also do puzzles together (training in patience), we read aloud and vocally act out plays (training in humility and courage), we read books to each other (training in diction), and of course we try to spend more of our time praying together.

If you have any thoughts on movies, entertainment, the ability to appreciate, etc, please respond and discuss!

Great Website:

The Catholic Education Resource Center – For whatever reason, this site never disappoints when it comes to having a consistant supply of very solid and informative Catholic articles. Many sites are a mixed bag one has to sift through, but I am continually please by the variety and quality. Recently read some great articles addressing the “Christopher West Critiques” that have been going around and a fun article about the “manliness” of St. Thomas Aquinas. It is, as its title suggests, a tremendous “resource” for any Catholic reader.

Great Book:

Master Christian author Clive Staples (CS) Lewis offers up a work of pure delight and wonder to fiction lovers. This rollicking sci-fi tale follows Dr. Ransom as he uncovers a living, breathing universe where he thought there was only dead space. It is a universe which not only is populated with extraterrestrials of all shapes and sizes and levels of intelligence, but it is a universe where the physical world is only the “tip of the iceberg” and in which “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” (Shakespeare, Hamlet)

There is great commentary of technology, language, space travel, philosophy, modernism, and a whole host of other themes, all of which are woven beautifully, subtly, and seamlessly into this epic. Like all great books, they gets better every time you read them! I am on my fourth read through and am only picking up on more and more of Lewis’ genius. Definitely a must-read!

Great Quote:

An “impersonal God”– well and good. A subjective God of beauty, truth and goodness, inside our own heads — better still. A formless life-force surging through us, a vast power which we can tap — best of all. But God Himself, alive, pulling at the other end of the cord, perhaps, approaching an infinite speed, the hunter, king, husband — that is quite another matter. There comes a moment when the children who have been playing at burglars hush suddenly: was that a real footstep in the hall? There comes a moment when people who have been dabbling in religion (“Man’s search for God!”) suddenly draw back. Supposing we really found Him? We never meant it to come to that! Worse still, supposing He had found us? –C. S. Lewis

The Insights of Infatuation

By | Marriage & Family, Philosophy and Culture, Why Aren't We Saints? | 2 Comments

Its no great revelation that “infatuation doesn’t last”. We know, and yet we all forget when the time comes, that the infatuation stage or mode in a relationship is passing and short-term and should not be the basis of one’s relationship. Even in the stage of infatuation, two lovers must be thinking longer term – asking deeper questions, seeking to learn about one another, seeking to become better lovers.

Now that I am married, while I do have days when I feel infatuated again with my wife, most days I am content with peaceful joy in my marriage rather than the flighty infatuation I once had.

Of course the biggest change that occurs when the infatuation leaves is that whereas before one’s lover seemed to be able to do no wrong and the act of charitably loving them in every situation was almost instinctual rather than willful, now one’s will must often be engaged. The choice of love now loses the feelings of infatuation that made the choice so easy.

Though infatuation itself is simply a state of one’s feelings, mostly brought on by biology, and thus shouldn’t be pursued, relied upon, or expected to last forever, I think we can learn some valuable lessons by reflecting on our hearts in the state of infatuation. Especially on days when we are struggling to love, struggling to be patient, or struggling to fulfill our responsibilities – during these times, reflecting on the state of our previously infatuate hearts can be very insightful, and not necessarily in the ways you might initially think.

Two instances of infatuation come to mind that bear reflection – infatuation as it presented itself in the early days of my relationship with my now-wed wife and infatuation as it is still stirred up sometimes in my heart today.

First, thinking back to the early days of my relationship, It is interesting to recall the state and movements of one’s infatuate heart. Again, the choice to love didn’t even feel like a choice – it was a movement, a passion, and a drive almost. In fact this often gets people into trouble because they forget that love is indeed a choice, and aren’t prepared when the feelings settle.

But it is nevertheless helpful to remember our hearts as they were in infatuation. Not just “how easy it was to love then and how much harder it sometimes is now”, but precisely how did I love? What things did I do? It seems that in the struggle with the choice to love in the present, I may be able to gain insight from the past.

This struck me most poignantly one day when I had found myself frustrated with my mother. After a trying phone call, I had felt the old teenager in me rise in my chest. For a moment I seethed and prayed for patience. But suddenly and inexplicably two thoughts shone clearly in my mind: 1) How I treated my then girlfriend (now wife) and 2) how I treated my mom.

The former I had been decidedly infatuated with, the latter, obviously not. But the comparison hit me nevertheless like a load of bricks. With no small help from infatuation, I was patient with my girlfriend, would listen to her on the phone for hours without growing weary, and would receive every possible irritant with ease. However in the case of my dear mother, I was constantly impatient, could find no time to listen to her, and would instantly become defensive and irritated at the slightest provocation.

However the epiphany did not end there. I saw not just the passive ways I loved and respected my girlfriend for whom I pined, but also the active ways. I always asked how her day was, I constantly inquired as to her feelings, likes and dislikes, and I bought her gifts and left notes as gestures of affection.

But how did I actively love my mother? Certainly one’s infatuated love for one’s girlfriend and the familial love for one’s mother are going to look very different, but nevertheless the comparison shone true. I never asked in any sincerely curious or caring way how my mother was doing. I rarely went out of my way to show her any affection or respect. I realized I knew (or remember) almost nothing about my mothers’ likes, dislikes, past life, or feelings.

As said, the realizations hit home and took root. I began to put these things into practice and love my mother better.

The second instance of infatuation that bears reflection are those days and times when infatuation returns.

All day today I had made small choices – an act of laziness here, letting myself be distracted there, and being selfish in little ways, right and left. Unsurprisingly, later on today when I found myself in a situation that called for patience and charity, my heart was hard and peevish.

As my wife went out to do errands I rallied slightly, saying some prayers, making a to-do list, and shaking myself out of laziness. By the time she returned I had completed my to do list, sought God in prayer and some needed silence, and was feeling in a much better mood all around.

Furthermore, as she walked in with the groceries, I felt a bit of the old fire rekindle in my heart. Conversation came quickly, I found myself feeling concerned and interested, and I was up on nimble toes setting the table for the dinner which I had prepared while she was out.

The summary and conclusion of these two reflections, for me, constitute a personal lesson in the nature of love, emotions, and the relationship between the two.

In the first reflection, recalling the instances where infatuation had made the choice to love my girlfriend practically a non-choice, showed me where I was falling short in loving my mother as I was called to do. However even more practically, the reflection had given me specific suggestions as to how I was to love her.

Sometimes this can be the struggle. Its not just that we are having a hard time choosing to love, but rather in the hardness of our hearts we almost temporarily seem to forget how to love, and all we can think of is how annoyed we are or how tough the situation is (feels). When in this situation, it can be helpful thus to return in reflection to a time and a relationship where infatuation/feelings had made the choices to love quite easy, and then to procure from this reflection specific acts of love and mercy that we can perform in the present.

This first reflection is practical enough and mostly common sensical, but the second reflection shines additional light. In the second reflection we see two instances where actions produce or prompt feelings. Lazy/selfish actions produce an apathetic and selfish heart. Loving/obedient/humble actions produce a heart of charity. It wasn’t until I consciously, willfully performed acts of charity that I began to really feel appreciative of my mom again.

The key here is that while we often look to feelings, emotions, and indeed “infatuation” to be the motor for our actions, while these are sometimes given to us as a grace, WEcan control and are responsible for our actions, regardless of our feelings. Whereas we often wait for and are dismayed when we don’t have “good mood” to be able to “act like a Christian”, we always have the choice to love, even in the worst of moods.

In summary, I have a very obsessive, anxious, inward personality and when I hit a situation in which I am finding it difficult to love, often the “head-game” is what really gets me.

Thus, I offer to you the same advice I give myself: When a time of desolation is making it difficult to love, reflect on the times of consolation. Reflecting on my past infatuation with my girlfriend I can glean specific acts of love that I should put into practice even today, when my feelings aren’t providing much help. Furthermore, reflecting on current instances of infatuation, I recall the oft forgotten common sense that I am always in control and responsible for my actions and that where my will leads, my heart will follow.

Recall the actions of love and reclaim the primacy of your will to accomplish them. Then, take heart and trust that if you choose to love in action you will in turn kindle (or rekindle) the passion.

The proof of love is in the works. Where love exists, it works great things. But when it ceases to act, it ceases to exist. — Pope St. Gregory the Great

We can do no great things; only small things with great love. — Blessed Teresa of Calcutta’

Marriage is an act of will that signifies and involves a mutual gift, which unites the spouses and binds them to their eventual souls, with whom they make up a sole family – a domestic church. – Pope John Paul II